Vulnerability GHSA-qhr7-859c-m2p7

High Risk
HIGH RISK
CVSS Score: 7.5
Score Range: 7.0–8.9
High severity vulnerabilities (CVSS 7.0–8.9). Serious vulnerabilities that should be prioritized soon after critical fixes.
4 hours ago
September 29, 2026 at 11:45 PM UTC
brace-expansion: DoS via uncontrolled recursion on nested brace groups causing stack exhaustion
0.0.0 - 1.1.19 and 2.0.0 - 2.1.5 and 3.0.0 - 3.0.7 and 4.0.0 - 5.0.10
0.0.0 - 1.1.19 and 2.0.0 - 2.1.5 and 3.0.0 - 3.0.7 and 4.0.0 - 5.0.10

Summary

brace-expansion: DoS via uncontrolled recursion on nested brace groups causing stack exhaustion

Details

Summary

expand_() recurses once per level of brace nesting. Deeply nested input exhausts the native stack and crashes the process.

This is distinct from CVE-2026-14257 / GHSA-mh99-v99m-4gvg, which made the tail iterative (recursion on m.post, driven by how many groups are chained). Nesting depth drives a different recursion that the tail fix never touched, so the documented constant-stack-depth guarantee only ever covered chained input, not nested input.

It is also distinct from GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p, which fixed recursion in parseCommaParts(). Both payloads below still crash with that fix applied.

Two recursion sites

Comma members. Each alternative of a brace set is expanded by a recursive call, so nesting a set inside every alternative recurses once per level:

expand('{a,'.repeat(4000) + 'z' + '}'.repeat(4000))
// RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded

Crashes at depth 3,907 - about 15.6 KB of input.

Single set. A brace set whose body parses to a single part is expanded by a recursive call before being re-wrapped (x{{a,b}}y -> x{a}y x{b}y), which recurses once per nesting level:

expand('{'.repeat(3200) + 'a,b' + '}'.repeat(3200))
// RangeError: Maximum call stack size exceeded

Crashes at depth 3,125 - about 6.25 KB of input. This is the cheapest stack-exhaustion payload known against this package: roughly a quarter the input of GHSA-6j4f-fj2g-mc7p (29 KB), and about a tenth of minimatch's MAX_PATTERN_LENGTH (65,536).

Why max and maxLength do not help

Both crashes happen while recursing into sub-expansions, before the result set grows. The payloads produce almost no output - the single-set case yields 2 results - so neither bound is ever the limiter. expand(payload, { max: 1, maxLength: 1 }) still overflows.

Impact

Any application passing an untrusted string to expand(), directly or through minimatch / glob as a user-supplied glob pattern, can be crashed. In Node a RangeError the application does not catch terminates the process, so a server globbing user input is exposed to remote unauthenticated denial of service.

Availability only. No code execution, no data exposure.

Affected versions

Verified affected on 1.1.18, 2.1.4, 3.0.6 and 5.0.9, at near-identical depths on every line (single set: 3,125 on all four; comma members: 3,907-4,102). Not a regression from any recent fix - the gap predates them.

Patch

A maxDepth bound (default EXPANSION_MAX_DEPTH) is threaded through expand_(). Past the cap a group is treated as non-expanding and returned literally, which is how the parser already handles a group that cannot expand. This matches the existing max / maxLength caps, which truncate rather than throw, so expand() continues never to throw on any input.

The default sits far above any realistic nesting depth and well below the crash threshold.

Related Vulnerabilities

Other vulnerabilities affecting the same packages

View all vulnerabilities for these packages

Impacted packages

Timeline

Published
4 hours ago
September 29, 2026 at 11:45 PM UTC
Fixed (5.0.11)
Unknown
Unknown
Fixed (3.0.8)
Unknown
Unknown
Fixed (2.1.6)
Unknown
Unknown
Fixed (1.1.20)
Unknown
Unknown
Last Modified
4 hours ago
September 30, 2026 at 12:00 AM UTC